Skip to main content

Teleflex Medical Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

9th CircuitMarch 21, 2017No. 14-56366Cited 14 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
O'Scannlain, Rawlinson, Callahan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of LMA North America, Inc., holding that the excess insurer (National Union) breached its contract and acted in bad faith by refusing to contribute to or take over defense of a reasonable settlement, and awarded attorney's fees to the plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**Insurance Company Must Pay Up When It Wrongfully Refuses to Cover Settlement** This case involved a dispute between LMA North America, Inc. and their insurance company, National Union Fire Insurance. When LMA faced a lawsuit that could result in significant financial damages, they reached what appeared to be a reasonable settlement agreement. However, their excess insurance company - which provides coverage above a certain amount - refused to help pay for the settlement or take over the legal defense, even though their insurance contract required them to do so. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of LMA North America. The court found that National Union had broken their insurance contract and acted in bad faith by refusing to contribute to the reasonable settlement or take control of the legal defense. As punishment for this wrongful behavior, the court also ordered National Union to pay LMA's attorney's fees. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that insurance companies cannot simply refuse to honor their contractual obligations when their policyholders face legal claims. When employers have proper insurance coverage, it helps ensure that funds are available to pay settlements or judgments in employment-related lawsuits, which can benefit workers who win cases against their employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.