Skip to main content

Deandre Russell v. Redstone Federal Credit Union

11th CircuitOctober 3, 2017No. 16-15117 Non-Argument Calendar
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Carnes, Pryor, Anderson
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
3890 Other Statutory Actions
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Russell's complaint for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Truth in Lending Act, and constitutional claims, finding them barred by res judicata and lacking federal question jurisdiction.

What This Ruling Means

**Russell v. Redstone Federal Credit Union: Employment Dispute** This case involved Deandre Russell, who had a workplace dispute with his employer, Redstone Federal Credit Union. Russell appealed his case to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers federal courts in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The dispute was classified as involving "other statutory actions," meaning it likely involved claims under federal employment laws, though the specific details of what happened between Russell and the credit union are not available from the court records. Unfortunately, the outcome of this appeal is not clear from the available information. The case was filed in October 2017, but whether Russell won or lost his appeal, and what specific employment issues were at stake, cannot be determined from the limited court documentation. **What This Means for Workers:** While we can't learn from the specific outcome here, this case shows that employees do have the right to challenge their employers in federal court when they believe employment laws have been violated. Workers can appeal unfavorable decisions to higher courts like the 11th Circuit. However, the limited information available also highlights how complex employment litigation can be, and why workers should seek legal counsel when facing workplace disputes that may involve federal employment protections.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.