Skip to main content

Boehm v. Black Diamond Casino Events, L.L.C.

Ohio Ct. App.June 19, 2018No. C-170339
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Miller
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court granted the defendant's motion for involuntary dismissal under Civ.R. 41(B)(2) at the close of the plaintiff's case on the trade secrets misappropriation claim, and the appellate court affirmed this dismissal.

Excerpt

TRADE SECRETS – MISAPPROPRIATION: A company's client list and financial data are trade secrets where the client list and financial data derive independent value from not being generally known, and where the company has made efforts to maintain their secrecy. The unauthorized sharing of a company's trade secrets with an accountant, even for the purposes of due diligence for an investment in the company, and the disapproved retention of trade secrets, even for the purposes of preparing for litigation, are misappropriations under Ohio's Uniform Trade Secrets Act. A claim for misappropriation of trade secrets does not require proof of damages.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** An employee at Black Diamond Casino Events took the company's client list and financial information without permission. The employee shared this confidential business information with an accountant, claiming it was needed for investment due diligence and later kept the information to prepare for a lawsuit against the company. **What the court decided:** The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled that the company's client list and financial data were legally protected "trade secrets" because they had value specifically because they were kept confidential, and the company had taken steps to keep them secret. The court found that the employee illegally misappropriated these trade secrets by sharing them with the accountant and keeping them without authorization, even though the employee claimed legitimate business reasons. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling shows that employees can face serious legal consequences for taking or sharing their employer's confidential business information, even if they believe they have good reasons. Workers should be very careful about what company information they access, copy, or share with others - including accountants, lawyers, or potential investors. Before handling any sensitive company data, employees should get clear written permission from their employer to avoid potential trade secret violation claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.