SANG PARK VS. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (L-4045-18, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's UM/UIM insurance claim against GEICO, holding that plaintiff failed to protect GEICO's subrogation rights by not filing suit against the tortfeasor within the statute of limitations, and that the relation-back doctrine did not apply to save the claim.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.