Skip to main content

Jones v. Unknown Employees of Kerrville Bus Line

5th CircuitJune 12, 2008No. 08-30018Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jolly, Smith, Barksdale
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment dismissal of Jones' breach of contract and emotional distress claims against Kerrville Bus Line, finding he failed to satisfy the federal diversity jurisdiction amount-in-controversy requirement of $75,000.

What This Ruling Means

# Jones v. Kerrville Bus Line: Court Summary ## What Happened Jones filed a lawsuit against Kerrville Bus Line, claiming the company broke their employment contract and caused him emotional distress. He wanted compensation for his losses. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed Jones' entire case before it could proceed to trial. The reason wasn't about whether Jones was right or wrong about his claims. Instead, the court ruled it didn't have the power to hear the case because Jones wasn't claiming enough money in damages. Federal courts require disputes involving $75,000 or more to use their services. Jones' claimed damages fell short of this threshold, so the case was thrown out. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case highlights an important barrier for workers with smaller claims. Even if an employee has a legitimate breach of contract complaint, they may not be able to use federal court if their damages don't meet the dollar minimum. This means workers with smaller claims often must pursue cases in state court instead, or may find it too costly to pursue justice at all.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.