Skip to main content

Mattiola Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union Insurance

PACTCOMPLPHILADMarch 8, 2002No. no. 121169
Plaintiff WinCommercial Union Insurance Co.$75,900 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Herron
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted Mattiola Construction's motion for summary judgment on its breach of contract claim against the insurer, holding that liquidated damages arising from property damage caused by the subcontractor's tortious conduct are covered under the commercial general liability insurance policy.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Case Was About:** Mattiola Construction had a commercial insurance policy with Commercial Union Insurance Company. When one of Mattiola's subcontractors caused property damage on a job site, Mattiola had to pay liquidated damages (predetermined penalty amounts written into their contract). Mattiola then asked their insurance company to cover these costs, but Commercial Union refused to pay, claiming the damages weren't covered under the policy. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled in favor of Mattiola Construction and ordered Commercial Union to pay $75,900 in damages. The judge found that the insurance company had breached its contract by refusing to cover the liquidated damages. The court determined that when a subcontractor's wrongful actions cause property damage, and the main contractor has to pay predetermined penalty amounts because of that damage, those costs should be covered under a standard commercial liability insurance policy. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling helps protect construction workers and contractors by clarifying insurance coverage. When subcontractors make mistakes that lead to property damage, the main contractor won't be left paying out of pocket for predetermined penalties. This decision strengthens the safety net that insurance provides for construction businesses and their workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.