Skip to main content

Mankin Media Systems, Inc. v. Timothy Corder

Tenn. Ct. App.June 30, 2022No. M2021-00830-COA-R3-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Kenny Armstrong
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Excerpt

Appellant appeals the trial court's order affirming the award of an arbitrator. Appellant filed suit against its former employee, the Appellee, alleging breach of contract for violation of certain provisions of the employee handbook, which also contained an arbitration clause. Because the handbook does not constitute an enforceable employment contract, the trial court erred in ordering the parties to arbitrate and in affirming the arbitrator's award. Reversed and remanded.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Mankin Media Systems sued their former employee Timothy Corder, claiming he violated rules in the company's employee handbook. The company argued this was a breach of contract and wanted the dispute resolved through arbitration (a private process instead of court), as specified in the handbook. A lower court agreed and sent the case to arbitration, where an arbitrator made a decision in favor of one party. The company then appealed this process. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court reversed the lower court's decision, ruling that the employee handbook was not actually an enforceable contract. Because the handbook wasn't a valid contract, the arbitration clause within it was also invalid. This meant the parties couldn't be forced to use arbitration to resolve their dispute, and any arbitrator's decision based on the handbook was meaningless. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling is significant because it clarifies that employee handbooks don't automatically create binding contracts between workers and employers. Workers cannot be forced into arbitration simply because it's mentioned in a handbook, unless there's a separate, valid employment contract. This potentially gives employees more options for resolving workplace disputes through the regular court system rather than private arbitration.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Mankin Media Systems, Inc. v. Timothy Corder from the same court.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.