Skip to main content

Mankin Media Systems, Inc. v. Timothy Corder

Tenn. Ct. App.June 30, 2022No. M2021-00830-COA-R3-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Kenny Armstrong
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Excerpt

Appellant appeals the trial court's order affirming the award of an arbitrator. Appellant filed suit against its former employee, the Appellee, alleging breach of contract for violation of certain provisions of the employee handbook, which also contained an arbitration clause. Because the handbook does not constitute an enforceable employment contract, the trial court erred in ordering the parties to arbitrate and in affirming the arbitrator's award. Reversed and remanded.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute between Mankin Media Systems and their former employee, Timothy Corder. The company sued Corder, claiming he violated rules in the employee handbook after he left his job. The handbook contained a clause requiring any disputes to go through arbitration (a private process instead of court). The company wanted to force Corder into arbitration based on this handbook provision. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court ruled in favor of the employee. The court found that the employee handbook was not a legally binding contract between the company and worker. Because the handbook wasn't an enforceable contract, the arbitration clause within it was also invalid. The court reversed the lower court's decision that had forced the employee into arbitration and upheld the arbitrator's ruling against him. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision is significant because it clarifies that employee handbooks don't automatically create binding contracts. Workers cannot be forced into arbitration simply because their handbook contains such a clause, unless there's a separate, valid employment contract. This gives employees more options to resolve disputes in court rather than through private arbitration, which often favors employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Mankin Media Systems, Inc. v. Timothy Corder from the same court.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.