Skip to main content

Barncord v. San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Pension Fund, Local 2

9th CircuitFebruary 26, 2003No. No. 01-17410; D.C. No. CV-00-04177-MJJ
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the pension fund, holding that Barncord's disability pension benefits were not protected from forfeiture because they constituted ancillary benefits rather than accrued benefits under ERISA.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Barncord was a worker who received disability pension benefits from the San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Pension Fund. At some point, the pension fund took away his disability benefits. Barncord sued, claiming this violated his contract and federal pension law (ERISA), arguing that his benefits should have been protected from being taken away. **What the Court Decided** The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Barncord and sided with the pension fund. The court found that his disability pension benefits were "ancillary benefits" rather than "accrued benefits" under federal pension law. This distinction was crucial because accrued benefits have stronger legal protections against being taken away, while ancillary benefits do not have the same level of protection. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that not all pension benefits have the same legal protections. Workers need to understand that disability pension benefits may be more vulnerable to being reduced or eliminated than regular retirement benefits. If you're counting on disability pension benefits, it's important to carefully review your pension plan documents to understand what protections exist and what circumstances might allow the fund to modify or eliminate these benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.