Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Mastronardi Mason Materials Co.

2nd CircuitApril 23, 2003No. No. 02-4222Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cabranes, Kearse, Straub
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationDiscriminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board's petition to enforce its order against Mastronardi Mason Materials Co. and Queens Ready Mix, Inc. was granted. The court affirmed that QRM was the alter ego/successor of MMM, that both companies violated the NLRA by refusing to recognize Local 282 and discriminating against union employees, and ordered reinstatement and back pay for two employees.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: National Labor Relations Board v. Mastronardi Mason Materials Co. **What Happened** Two companies, Mastronardi Mason Materials Co. and Queens Ready Mix, Inc., refused to recognize Local 282, a union representing their workers. The companies discriminated against employees who supported unionization and violated federal labor laws protecting workers' rights to organize. **What the Court Decided** A federal appeals court sided with the National Labor Relations Board and upheld its enforcement order. The court confirmed that both companies were essentially the same operation and violated labor laws by rejecting the union and mistreating union-supporting employees. The court ordered the companies to reinstate two fired workers and pay them back wages for lost income. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces that companies cannot avoid their legal obligations to workers simply by changing names or creating separate business entities. Workers have the right to unionize and cannot be punished for supporting a union. When companies illegally retaliate against union activities, courts can force them to rehire workers and compensate lost earnings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.