Skip to main content

Tessema v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union

D. Nev.February 8, 2017No. Case No. 2:13-cv-01782-APG-VCFCited 2 times
Defendant WinAN.L.V. Cab Co.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gordon
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motions for summary judgment on both remaining claims. The employer did not breach the CBA by firing Tessema for participating in a wildcat strike, and the union did not breach its duty of fair representation.

What This Ruling Means

# Tessema v. United Steel Workers Case Summary **What Happened** A taxi company driver named Tessema was fired after participating in a wildcat strike—a strike that happened without union approval or authorization. Tessema sued, claiming the employer broke the union contract and that the union failed to represent him fairly by not fighting his dismissal. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled against Tessema on both claims. The judge found that the employer had the right to fire him for participating in the unauthorized strike, even though a union contract was in place. The court also determined the union met its obligation to represent Tessema fairly. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that workers participating in strikes without union approval may lose their legal protections. Even when a union contract exists, employers can fire workers for wildcat strikes. Additionally, unions are not required to fight every dismissal to the fullest extent possible. Workers should coordinate strike activities with their union and understand that unauthorized actions may result in job loss without contractual protection.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.