Skip to main content

United States Can Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervening

7th CircuitJune 19, 2001No. 99-2828, 99-3049Cited 7 times
Plaintiff WinUnited States Can Company$1,500,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Coffey, Easterbrook, Evans
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWrongful Termination

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board's remedial order was enforced, requiring United States Can Company to pay approximately $1.5 million in back pay plus pension credits, fringe benefits, and over a decade of interest to 28 employees who were denied transfer opportunities under a collective bargaining agreement between 1987-1989.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Ruling Summary: United States Can Company v. NLRB** This case involved a dispute between United States Can Company and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), with the United Steelworkers union also participating. The company challenged an NLRB decision, though the specific details of the underlying workplace dispute are not provided in the available information. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard the case in June 2001, but the final outcome and court's decision are not specified in the available records. No monetary damages were reported as part of this proceeding. **What This Means for Workers:** While the specific details and outcome aren't available, this type of case typically involves important worker rights under federal labor law. When companies challenge NLRB decisions in federal court, it usually relates to issues like union organizing rights, collective bargaining, workplace safety, or unfair labor practices. The involvement of the United Steelworkers union suggests this case likely dealt with unionized workers' rights. Even without knowing the specific outcome, such cases help establish precedents that can affect how labor laws are interpreted and enforced, potentially impacting workers' rights to organize, bargain collectively, and seek protection from unfair treatment.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.