Skip to main content

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Dana Corporation

6th CircuitJanuary 22, 2002No. 00-4167Cited 29 times
Plaintiff WinDana Corporation
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Keith, Boggs, Moore
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment enforcing the arbitrator's award in favor of the UAW against Dana Corporation for violations of the neutrality provision in their collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, this case involved a dispute between the United Auto Workers union (UAW) and Dana Corporation, a major automotive parts manufacturer. The case appears to have centered on employment-related issues between the union and the company, though the specific details of the disagreement are not available in the provided excerpt. The court filing occurred in January 2002 in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, but the outcome of this particular case is not specified in the available information. No monetary damages are reported, which could suggest the dispute involved other types of relief or was resolved through different means. **What this means for workers:** While the specific outcome isn't clear, this case represents the ongoing relationship between labor unions and employers in the automotive industry. The UAW has historically fought for worker protections, fair wages, and safe working conditions. Cases like this demonstrate how unions can take legal action when they believe employers have violated workers' rights or labor agreements. For unionized workers, this shows the importance of having union representation to address workplace disputes through the court system when necessary. The case also highlights how employment law continues to evolve through court decisions that can affect workers' rights industry-wide.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.