Skip to main content

Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings

2nd CircuitOctober 6, 2016No. Docket No. 14-4101-cvCited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Chin, Hall, Wesley
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Pasternack's negligence and fraud claims against LabCorp and ChoicePoint, holding that FAA/DOT drug testing regulations do not create a duty of care under New York law and that fraud reliance cannot be established through third-party reliance.

What This Ruling Means

# Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings **What Happened** An employee named Pasternack sued Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp) and a related company, claiming they were negligent and committed fraud in handling drug testing. The dispute centered on whether these companies had a legal responsibility to follow federal drug-testing rules carefully. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court sided with LabCorp and dismissed Pasternack's case. The court ruled that federal drug-testing regulations do not create a legal duty that allows workers to sue for negligence. Additionally, the court found that Pasternack could not prove fraud had occurred. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling limits workers' ability to sue drug testing companies for mistakes or carelessness during testing procedures. Workers cannot rely solely on federal regulations to establish a negligence case against testing companies. This means employees may have fewer legal options if they believe a testing company mishandled their results, even if those companies violated federal rules.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.