Skip to main content

Lucey v. Nevada ex. rel. Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education

9th CircuitMay 21, 2010No. No. 09-15996
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fawsett, McKeown, Rymer
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of ContractRetaliation

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the defendant university, finding that Lucey's procedural and substantive due process rights were satisfied and that UNLV did not breach any contract or engage in negligent hiring, training, or retaliation.

What This Ruling Means

**Lucey v. Nevada System of Higher Education - Court Ruling Summary** A university employee sued the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) after being fired, claiming the termination was wrongful, violated their contract, and was retaliation for protected activities. The employee argued that the university didn't follow proper procedures when firing them and that their constitutional rights were violated. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of UNLV. The court found that the university had followed all required procedures before terminating the employee and respected their constitutional due process rights. The court also determined that UNLV did not breach any employment contract or engage in retaliation against the employee for any protected activities. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that public university employees have constitutional protections during termination proceedings, but employers can still legally fire workers if they follow proper procedures. Workers should understand that having due process rights doesn't guarantee job security - it only ensures fair treatment during disciplinary actions. If you're a public employee facing termination, document everything and understand what procedures your employer must follow. However, meeting procedural requirements doesn't prevent legitimate terminations based on job performance or conduct.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.