Skip to main content

Frankl ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. HTH Corp.

D. Haw.November 29, 2011No. No. CIV. 10-00014JMS/RLPCited 4 times
Plaintiff WinHTH Corp.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Seabright
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Hawaii

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court granted in part the NLRB's motion for civil contempt and compensatory relief, finding that HTH Corp. and related entities violated a March 2010 injunction requiring compliance with the National Labor Relations Act. The court imposed sanctions for contemptuous conduct related to labor organizing interference.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules Against Company for Blocking Worker Organizing** This case involved HTH Corp., a company that interfered with employees' rights to organize and form unions. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had previously obtained a court order in March 2010 requiring HTH Corp. to follow federal labor laws and stop blocking workers' organizing activities. However, the company continued to violate these rules and ignore the court's order. The court found that HTH Corp. was in contempt for deliberately disobeying the previous injunction. The judge granted the NLRB's request for sanctions against the company and ordered compensatory relief for the harm caused to workers. The court determined that HTH Corp. and related companies had engaged in contemptuous conduct by continuing to interfere with employees' labor organizing efforts despite being legally required to stop. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will enforce employees' rights to organize and join unions. When companies repeatedly violate labor laws, even after being ordered to stop, they can face serious legal consequences including sanctions. The decision reinforces that workers have protected rights under federal law to organize collectively, and employers cannot ignore court orders designed to protect these rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.