Skip to main content

Alvaro Orosco v. Jamal K. Dabbous

C.D. Cal.August 1, 2023No. 2:23-cv-06183
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Case dismissed; 9th Circuit review

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court dismissed the ADA claim against individual defendant Jamal K. Dabbous due to lack of statutory employer coverage or individual liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Disability Discrimination Case Dismissed Against Individual Manager** Alvaro Orosco filed a disability discrimination lawsuit against Jamal K. Dabbous, claiming violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Orosco alleged that Dabbous discriminated against him because of his disability while he was employed. The court dismissed the case entirely. The judge ruled that Dabbous could not be held personally liable under the ADA because he was an individual person rather than a qualifying employer. The ADA only applies to employers with 15 or more employees, and individual supervisors or managers typically cannot be sued directly under this law, even if they made the discriminatory decisions. This ruling is important for workers to understand because it shows the limitations of federal disability discrimination laws. If you face disability discrimination at work, you generally need to sue the company itself, not individual managers or supervisors. The ADA protects workers from discrimination, but only when the employer meets certain size requirements and other legal standards. Workers experiencing disability discrimination should focus their legal claims on the employer as an entity rather than trying to hold individual employees personally responsible under federal law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.