Skip to main content

Grossman v. Hawaii Government Employees Association/AFSCME Local 152

D. Haw.January 31, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00493
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Hawaii

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendants' cross-motions for summary judgment, denying plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The court found the good faith defense barred pre-Janus damages claims, and plaintiff's post-Janus damages and prospective relief claims were moot because she had received reimbursement and could not be subjected to the statute in the future.

What This Ruling Means

**Grossman v. Hawaii Government Employees Association Case Summary** This case involved a civil rights dispute between an individual named Grossman and the Hawaii Government Employees Association (HGEA), which is a union representing state workers in Hawaii (AFSCME Local 152). The specific details of what triggered the disagreement are not available from the court records provided. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning are not included in the available information. The case was filed in January 2020, but the outcome remains unclear from the provided documentation. No damages were reported in connection with this case. **What This Means for Workers:** While the specific outcome isn't known, this case highlights that workers can bring civil rights claims against their own unions when they believe their rights have been violated. Union members have legal protections and can challenge their union's actions in court if they feel they've been treated unfairly or discriminated against. Even though unions are supposed to represent workers' interests, they can still be held accountable under civil rights laws. Workers should know they have options if they believe their union has violated their civil rights, though each situation depends on specific circumstances.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.