Hernandez v. Nelson Precast Products LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved a settlement agreement whereby defendant Nelson Precast Products LLC agreed to pay $88,000 to resolve FLSA and state wage-and-hour claims, with plaintiffs' counsel awarded $63,657.75 in attorneys' fees and $1,342.25 in costs.
What This Ruling Means
Hernandez v. Nelson Precast Products LLC Settlement Summary
What Happened
Hernandez sued Nelson Precast Products LLC, claiming the company failed to pay wages owed and wrongfully fired him. The case involved federal wage-and-hour laws that require employers to pay workers for all time worked.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement in October 2023 where Nelson Precast agreed to pay $88,000 to resolve the wage theft and termination claims. The company also paid an additional $65,000 for the plaintiff's legal costs and attorney fees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts take wage theft seriously and will hold companies accountable. Workers who believe they haven't been paid fairly have legal options through the courts. The substantial settlement demonstrates that wrongfully terminated employees can pursue damages for lost wages and the harm caused by illegal firing. If your employer isn't paying you for hours worked or fires you in retaliation for complaining about wages, you may have similar legal protections.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.