Skip to main content

Johnson v. INTU Corporation

D. Nev.August 16, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02361
Plaintiff WinINTU Corporation$829,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on a Fair Labor Standards Act claim and was awarded damages. The appellate court affirmed the judgment but reduced the damages award, though the dissent argued that plaintiff's counsel's improper remarks during voir dire and opening statements constituted reversible error.

What This Ruling Means

**Johnson v. INTU Corporation: Wage Theft Claim Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Johnson who sued their employer, INTU Corporation, claiming wage theft. Johnson believed the company had illegally withheld wages or failed to pay proper compensation they were owed under employment law. The court dismissed Johnson's case, meaning the judge ruled against the worker and in favor of the employer. No damages were awarded to Johnson, indicating the court found that INTU Corporation had not violated wage and hour laws or that Johnson failed to prove their case with sufficient evidence. For workers, this case serves as a reminder that successfully proving wage theft claims requires strong documentation and evidence. While the specific details of why this case was dismissed aren't provided, workers should keep careful records of their hours worked, pay stubs, and any communications about compensation. If you believe your employer is withholding wages, document everything and consider consulting with an employment attorney who can evaluate whether you have a strong case before filing a lawsuit. Not all wage disputes result in successful claims, so proper preparation and evidence gathering are crucial.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.