Skip to main content

Johnson v. Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, LLP

S.D.N.Y.November 12, 2019No. 1:19-cv-08662
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The court was divided on whether an at-will employee can bring both tort and contract claims for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. The majority allowed both claims to proceed; the dissent argued only the tort claim should be viable.

What This Ruling Means

**Johnson v. Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, LLP: Employment Contract Dispute** This case involved an employee who claimed they were wrongfully fired and that their employer broke their employment contract. The worker argued they were terminated for reasons that violated public policy - meaning they were fired for doing something that benefits society or refusing to do something harmful or illegal. The court had to decide whether an at-will employee (someone who can normally be fired for almost any reason) could still sue for breach of contract when they believe they were fired for improper reasons. This case appears to focus on a dissenting judge's opinion, which disagreed with a lower court's decision to dismiss the contract claim. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights an important issue for employees - whether you can pursue both wrongful termination claims AND breach of contract claims simultaneously, even if you're an at-will employee. While at-will employment typically means you can be fired without cause, there may still be contract protections available when termination violates public policy. Workers should understand that having at-will status doesn't necessarily eliminate all legal protections, and employment contracts may provide additional safeguards beyond basic wrongful termination laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.