Skip to main content

Robinson v. De Niro

S.D.N.Y.July 9, 2021No. 1:19-cv-09156
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWage TheftRetaliationBreach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted defendants' motion to amend their answer and assert counterclaims (breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty of loyalty, conversion, and fraud) against plaintiff, while allowing plaintiff's employment discrimination, equal pay, and overtime claims to proceed. The case involves overlapping employment and fiduciary duty disputes.

What This Ruling Means

**Robinson v. De Niro Employment Case Summary** This case involved a workplace dispute between an employee named Robinson and actor Robert De Niro (or his company). Robinson filed a lawsuit claiming civil rights violations and employment discrimination, suggesting they faced unfair treatment at work based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or another legally protected status. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough information to explain what specific discrimination Robinson alleged or what the final outcome of the case was. The case was filed in federal court in New York in July 2021, but the current status and any court decision remain unclear from the available documentation. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the final outcome, this case highlights that all employees have the right to file discrimination complaints against any employer, regardless of the employer's fame or status. Workers who believe they've faced workplace discrimination based on protected characteristics can pursue legal action through federal civil rights laws. The fact that this case made it to federal court demonstrates that employment discrimination claims are taken seriously by the legal system, and no employer is above the law when it comes to treating workers fairly and legally.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.