Skip to main content

Duncan Robles v. Luis Furniture 1 Inc.

S.D.N.Y.October 26, 2021No. 1:20-cv-06951
Plaintiff WinLuis Furniture 1 Inc$120,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages for wage theft.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Duncan Robles filed a lawsuit against his employer, Luis Furniture 1 Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Robles alleged that the furniture company failed to pay him properly under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for minimum wage and overtime pay. This type of case typically involves disputes over unpaid wages, overtime compensation, or other violations of workers' pay rights. **What the Court Decided** The court records show this case was filed in federal court in New York in October 2021, but the final outcome and any damages awarded are not available in the public records. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights workers' rights to fair pay under federal law. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked over 40 in a week. When employers violate these rules, workers can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages. Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it demonstrates that employees have legal options when they believe their employer hasn't paid them correctly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.