Skip to main content

Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp.

S.D.N.Y.January 24, 2022No. 1:19-cv-08181
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Parties reached a settlement at a settlement conference. The court ordered submission of a joint letter motion with the settlement agreement by February 24, 2022, for court approval under Second Circuit standards for fair and reasonable settlements.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Court Case Summary: Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp.** **What Happened:** A worker named Montalvo Candia filed a lawsuit against their employer, 658-660 Amsterdam Corp, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The case involved alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace pay standards. **What the Court Decided:** Based on the available information, the final outcome of this case is not clear from the court records provided. The case was filed in federal court in New York in January 2022, but the resolution details are not available. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights workers' rights to fair pay under federal law. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked over 40 in a week. When workers believe their employer has violated these wage laws - such as by not paying proper overtime or paying below minimum wage - they can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages and seek other remedies. These protections apply to most workers across the United States.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.