Skip to main content

Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp.

S.D.N.Y.March 9, 2022No. 1:19-cv-08181
Plaintiff Win658-660 Amsterdam Corp$50,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of Montalvo Candia, finding that the employer violated wage and hour laws.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker named Montalvo Candia filed a lawsuit against 658-660 Amsterdam Corp, claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules about minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of what the employer allegedly did wrong aren't provided in the available information, FLSA violations typically involve issues like not paying minimum wage, failing to pay overtime for hours worked over 40 per week, or misclassifying employees. **Court Decision** The outcome of this case is not available from the provided information, so it's unclear how the court ultimately ruled on the worker's claims. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case represents the type of legal action workers can take when they believe their employer has violated federal wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives employees important protections, and workers have the right to file lawsuits when these protections are violated. Even without knowing the outcome, cases like this remind workers that legal remedies exist when employers fail to follow federal wage and hour requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.