Hine v. Insomnia Cookies
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff accepted defendant's offer of judgment in a Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour case. The court awarded reduced attorney's fees of $4,621.68 (after reducing rates, hours, and rejecting fees for post-settlement litigation caused by plaintiff's counsel error).
What This Ruling Means
Hine v. Insomnia Cookies: Settlement Summary
What Happened
An employee at Insomnia Cookies filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay wages fairly, violating federal wage-and-hour laws designed to protect workers' paychecks.
What the Court Decided
The case was settled, meaning both sides agreed to end the dispute without a full trial. The court approved the settlement and awarded the employee's lawyer $4,621.68 in attorney's fees. However, the court reduced this amount because the lawyer made some errors after the settlement was reached, causing unnecessary additional work.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employees have legal protections if employers don't pay them correctly. When workers win wage-theft cases, their lawyers can recover fees from the employer, making it easier for workers to afford legal help. The settlement suggests the company and employee reached an agreement about unpaid wages, though specific payment details weren't disclosed. This case demonstrates that wage violations can lead to real consequences for employers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Hine from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.