MUNOZ v. GOLDBERG, MILLER & RUBIN, P.C.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- settlement
- State
- Pennsylvania
- Circuit
- Third Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
District court approved settlement of Fair Labor Standards Act claims for wage and hour violations. Plaintiff Munoz received $6,250 total ($3,125 for unpaid wages and $3,125 for liquidated damages); plaintiff Byas received $200.10 total ($100.05 for unpaid wages and $100.05 for liquidated damages).
What This Ruling Means
Munoz v. Goldberg, Miller & Rubin, P.C.
What Happened
Employees at the law firm Goldberg, Miller & Rubin filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay them all the wages they earned and wrongfully fired at least one worker. The case centered on violations of federal wage and hour laws that protect workers' pay.
What the Court Decided
A federal court approved a settlement agreement requiring the firm to pay $6,450.10 in total damages to the affected employees. Munoz received $6,250 ($3,125 in unpaid wages plus an equal penalty amount), while Byas received $200.10 in back pay and penalties.
Why This Matters
This case reinforces that employers—even law firms—cannot legally withhold earned wages or retaliate against workers who speak up. When violations are found, courts can order companies to pay both the missing wages *and* additional damages as punishment. This settlement shows workers have legal protection and recourse if employers fail to pay them fairly.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.