Lawrance Alexander Bohm
Sacramento, CA
Contact Information
- Phone
- (866) 920-1292
- Website
- Visit Website
- Address
- 4600 Northgate Blvd Suite 210, Sacramento, CA 95834, USA, Sacramento, CA 95834
Professional Details
- Languages
- English
- Fee Structure
- Contact for details
- Listed Via
- avvo — View listing
Profile Summary (auto-generated)
Lawrance Alexander Bohm is the founder of the Bohm Law Group, an employment law firm established in 2005 that represents employees in cases involving wrongful termination, sexual harassment, hostile work environments, retaliation, discrimination (including age, race, gender, disability, and religious discrimination), wage theft, and whistleblower claims. The firm operates on a contingency fee basis, fronts litigation costs, and is known for its record-breaking trial verdicts and success in achieving substantial settlements. With offices throughout California, Bohm and his team provide confidential consultations and are recognized for their aggressive advocacy and reputation with California courts.
Auto-generated from public directory data — not written or endorsed by this attorney or Workers’ Rights.
Practice Areas
Recent federal employment cases
⚖ public court dockets- Employee v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. INQUIPCO, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016Family and Medical Leave Act
- Employee v. Mr. Crane, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016Family and Medical Leave Act
- Employee v. GameStop, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016plaintiff counselCivil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Plastic Package, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016Family and Medical Leave Act
- Employee v. William ParfetDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016plaintiff counselCivil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. AutoZone West LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016Family and Medical Leave Act
- Employee v. Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Best Buy IncDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. The Salvation ArmyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014Civil Rights: ADA-Employment
- Employee v. Amdocs, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employee v. Robert McDonaldDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. ActioNet IncDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014plaintiff counselCivil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Amdocs, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employee v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Adventist Health/WestDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012Civil Rights: Employment
- Employee v. Macy's Department Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011plaintiff counselCivil Rights: ADA-Employment
Source: U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/RECAP via CourtListener).
⚑ report an errorOther Employment Attorneys in Sacramento
Browse other attorneys with similar practice areas.
Facing a workplace issue?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Check My RightsAttorney listings are aggregated from public legal directories (including NELA, Avvo, and Google Places). Ratings, review counts, and membership badges are reported by those third-party sources — they are not a verification, endorsement, or recommendation by Workers’ Rights. Inclusion here does not mean the attorney is affiliated with, sponsors, or has any relationship with this site, and no attorney-client relationship is created. Always verify credentials, disciplinary history, and bar standing before retaining an attorney.