Giant Eagle, Inc.

The magistrate properly denied employer's request for a writ of mandamus. Some evidence supported Industrial Commission's decision that employee was unable to work as a direct result of an impairment arising from his workplace injury and not due to reasons unrelated to the injury.

The commission's determination that the employee is "precluded from engaging in all sustained remunerative employment, and thus permanently and totally disabled, is supported by some evidence in the record. And despite the commission's "concession," there was no requirement for it to address explicitly passages from one expert's opinion that were contrary in part to the expert opinion with which the commission "concur[red]." Having denied reconsideration of its grant of permanent total disability compensation, and not having identified a true legal error in its proceedings, the commission is not authorized on this record to revisit its decision. The magistrate's decision is not adopted, and the requested writ of mandamus is denied.

In a slip-and-fall negligence action, the trial court did not err in granting the defendant-grocery store's motion for summary judgment where undisputed evidence showed the grocery store employees' actions in cleaning the area of a spill and warning customers of the spill with a caution sign fulfilled the duty of care the grocery store owed to its business invitees. Judgment affirmed.