GIANT EAGLE, INC.
21 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2024)
8 trusted published court opinions across 7 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list GIANT EAGLE, INC. as an employer in 21 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2024.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, and 2 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 1 state (PA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 7 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
GIANT EAGLE, INC. appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Jordan v. Giant Eagle Supermarket (2020) — Defendant Win. This case involved a worker named Jordan who sued Giant Eagle Supermarket claiming the company falsely imprisoned him, broke their employment contract, violated his constitutional rights, and discriminated against him. Jordan represented himself in court without a lawyer. Read the ruling.
FITCH v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. (2020) — Mixed Result. Employees at Giant Eagle, a grocery chain, sued the company over unpaid overtime wages. Giant Eagle had been using an "Executive Exemption Acknowledgment" form with workers involved in these lawsuits. The employees claimed this form was intimidating and discouraged them from participating in the case. Read the ruling.
FITCH v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. (2020) — Remanded. Employees filed a wage theft case against Giant Eagle, a grocery store chain, claiming they were not properly paid for their work. The employer asked the court to dismiss part of the case early, before the parties had gathered all their evidence. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (3 of 8), Wrongful Termination, Workers’ Compensation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination and Workers’ Compensation.
Published opinions span Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Pennsylvania rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 0 ended the case in GIANT EAGLE, INC.’s favor and 2 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Retail employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.