Ho-Chunk Nation
10 federal employment cases from public court records (2009–2026)
9 with a published ruling · 1 open docket
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Ho-Chunk Nation as an employer in 10 employment matters between 2009 and 2026.
Of the 9 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 3 were sent back to a lower court, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, and 1 were dismissed.
Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 11% of matters with a recorded outcome.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Failure To Accommodate, and Constructive Discharge.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
About this employer
Ho-Chunk Nation appears in 9 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Wrongful Termination (7 of 9), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 9), Constructive Discharge. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate and Constructive Discharge.
Case Outcomes
Case Stages
The stage at which courts issued Ho-Chunk Nation’s 9 stage-identified rulings.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.