Skip to main content
Government & Public Sector

New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System

43 federal employment cases from public court records (20002018)

43 with a published ruling

What public court records show

Public federal court records list New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System as an employer in 43 employment matters between 2000 and 2018.

Of the 43 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 35 ended in a ruling for the employer, 4 were sent back to a lower court, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 2 were dismissed.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 5% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate, Wrongful Termination, and Breach Of Contract.

Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

43
Federal Cases
5%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

1
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System appears in 43 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Failure to Accommodate (4 of 43), Wrongful Termination (3 of 43), Breach of Contract (2 of 43). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate, Wrongful Termination and Breach of Contract.

Rulings span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
35 (81%)
Remanded
4 (9%)
Plaintiff Win
2 (5%)
Dismissed
2 (5%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System’s 43 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
43 (100%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

States

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys.
N.Y. App. Div. · Feb 2018 · New York
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys.
NY · May 2017 · New York · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · May 2014
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · May 2014
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Dec 2013
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Dec 2013 · Breach of Contract
Remanded
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Dec 2013
Remanded
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Dec 2013
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jun 2013
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jun 2013
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jan 2013 · New York
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jan 2013 · New York · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jun 2011 · Pension Benefits
Dismissed
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Mar 2011 · Failure to Accommodate
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Feb 2011
Remanded
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Dec 2010
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jul 2010
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jan 2010 · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jan 2010
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jan 2009
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Apr 2008
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Feb 2008
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Nov 2007
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Jun 2006
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
N.Y. App. Div. · Mar 2006
Defendant Win
Showing 25 of 43

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.