Precision Excavating
5 federal employment cases from public court records (2012–2018)
5 with a published ruling
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Precision Excavating as an employer in 5 employment matters between 2012 and 2018.
Of the 5 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 0% of matters with a recorded outcome.
The most common claims on record were Workers Compensation and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (UT).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
About this employer
Precision Excavating appears in 5 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the broader workplace context. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Workers’ Compensation (2 of 5), Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Workers’ Compensation and Wrongful Termination.
Rulings span Utah. Utah is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Utah rulings.
Case Outcomes
Claim Types
States
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with court rulings
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.