The Coca-Cola Company
90 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1997–2026)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases · 10 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list The Coca-Cola Company as an employer in 90 distinct federal employment cases between 1997 and 2026.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in KS.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
The Coca-Cola Company appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Anderson v. Heartland Coca-Cola (2022) — Mixed Result. This case involved an employment law dispute between an employee named Anderson and Heartland Coca-Cola, a beverage distribution company. The case was filed in a Kansas district court in February 2022. Read the ruling.
Anderson v. Heartland Coca-Cola (2021) — Dismissed. This case involved a workplace dispute between an employee named Anderson and Heartland Coca-Cola, a beverage company. The specific details of what Anderson claimed happened at work are not available from the court records provided. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (2006) — Remanded. This case involved a dispute between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company over alleged employment discrimination. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (4 of 8), Discrimination (2 of 8), Retaliation (2 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Retaliation.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span Kansas (2), New Mexico (1), Michigan (1), Ohio (1). Kansas is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Kansas rulings, New Mexico rulings, Michigan rulings and Ohio rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 0 ended the case in The Coca-Cola Company’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.