Venetian Casino Resort, LLC
10 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2025)
6 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Venetian Casino Resort, LLC as an employer in 10 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2025.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were dismissed, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in DC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Venetian Casino Resort, LLC appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Gil v. Venetian Casino Resort, LLC (2023) — Dismissed. An employee filed a lawsuit against Venetian Casino Resort claiming she faced discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination. She also stated the company failed to accommodate her needs as required by law. Read the ruling.
Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board (2015) — Mixed Result. This case involved workers at the Venetian Casino Resort in Las Vegas who were trying to organize a union. The casino was accused of interfering with workers' rights to form or join a union, which violates federal labor law. Read the ruling.
Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board (2007) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between the Venetian Casino Resort and a union organizer who was trying to reach workers at the casino. The casino took several aggressive actions against the union representative, including broadcasting trespass warnings, attempting to make a citizen's arrest, and calling the police. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (3 of 6), Discrimination (2 of 6), Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Wrongful Termination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span District of Columbia (2), Nevada (2). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings and Nevada rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Hospitality & Food Service employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.