Skip to main content

Xcel Energy Services, Inc.

14 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20042020)

2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Xcel Energy Services, Inc. as an employer in 14 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2020.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract.

Cases were filed across 1 state (MN).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

2
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.

1
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Xcel Energy Services, Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions on record. Private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The published opinion involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.

Published opinions span Minnesota. Minnesota is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Minnesota rulings.

Claim Types

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
W.D. Mich. · Dec 2020
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Inc.
D. Minn. · Nov 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Inc.
D. Minn. · Nov 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
D. Colo. · Oct 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
D. Minn. · Aug 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Colo. · Nov 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Colo. · Nov 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Colo. · Nov 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Colo. · Nov 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Colo. · Nov 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
D. Minn. · Jun 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services Inc
N.D. Tex. · Aug 2010
Docket closed
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Minn. · Apr 2005 · Minnesota · Breach of Contract
Settlement
Employee v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
D. Minn. · Mar 2004 · Minnesota · Breach of Contract
Mixed Result
Showing 14 of 14

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.