Skip to main content

Boorman v. Nevada Memorial Cremation Society, Inc.

D. Nev.February 24, 2011No. 2:07-mj-00706Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Philip M. Pro
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss some claims (conversion, fiduciary duty conspiracy against county defendants) while allowing emotional distress and negligence claims to proceed against county coroner and mortuary defendants, with leave granted to amend pleadings to add aiding and abetting claims.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee sued Nevada Memorial Cremation Society and Clark County after being wrongfully terminated. The worker claimed they were fired improperly and also alleged negligence, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty by their employers. **What the Court Decided** The court issued a mixed ruling. Some claims were dismissed entirely - specifically, conversion and fiduciary duty conspiracy claims against the county defendants. However, the court allowed other important claims to move forward, including emotional distress and negligence claims against both the county coroner and the cremation company. The court also gave the employee permission to amend their lawsuit to add new claims for "aiding and abetting" - meaning helping someone else do wrong. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that even when some claims get dismissed, workers may still have viable legal options. Courts will examine each claim separately, and some may survive while others don't. The ruling demonstrates that employees can potentially pursue multiple types of claims against different defendants when wrongful termination occurs. It also highlights that workers may be able to strengthen their cases by adding new claims as they discover more information about what happened.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.