No specific laws identified for this ruling.
This is an order of correction to the Supreme Court of Hawaii's opinion in a certiorari proceeding. The order corrects attorney credits in the underlying May 22, 2018 opinion regarding a dispute between Kimberly A. Pasco and the Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System.
Pasco v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System
What Happened
Kimberly A. Pasco had a dispute with the Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System, a Hawaii government agency that manages retirement benefits for public employees. The case involved employment law issues and reached Hawaii's highest court.
What the Court Decided
The Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion on May 22, 2018. Later, the court issued a correction order to fix mistakes in how attorneys were credited in that original opinion. The court did not award any damages in this case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case involved a retirement system dispute—something that affects many government employees' financial security. While the correction order itself is technical, the underlying case shows that workers can challenge retirement board decisions through the court system if they believe they've been treated unfairly. The specific details of what Pasco's dispute was about remain unclear from this correction order alone, but it demonstrates that employees have legal recourse against retirement system decisions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Pasco from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.