No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The 9th Circuit affirmed that the ministerial exception bars employment discrimination claims against religious schools, ruling that religious institutions have the right to select their own clergy and teachers without government interference.
Teacher's Discrimination Claims Against Religious School Rejected
Agnes Morrissey-Berru, a teacher at Our Lady of Guadalupe School, sued the religious school for age and disability discrimination after her employment ended. She claimed the school treated her unfairly because of her age and a disability.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Morrissey-Berru in 2019, deciding that the school was protected by something called the "ministerial exception." This legal principle says that religious organizations have the constitutional right to choose their own clergy and teachers without interference from the government, even when discrimination laws might otherwise apply.
The court determined that because Morrissey-Berru was considered a "minister" in her teaching role at the religious school, the school could make employment decisions about her position without being subject to federal anti-discrimination laws.
This ruling matters for workers because it limits legal protections for employees at religious institutions. Teachers and other staff at religious schools may have fewer rights to challenge workplace discrimination compared to employees at secular institutions. Workers considering positions at religious organizations should understand that they may not have the same legal recourse if they face discrimination.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Agnes Morrissey-Berru v. Our Lady of Guadalupe School from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.