Employment Rulings in the Fifth Circuit
The Fifth Circuit covers the federal courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,704 published rulings we track here (1970–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,704 published rulings we track in the Fifth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,689 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 297 summary-judgment rulings here, 188 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 108 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Fifth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Fifth Circuit
Louis Adams v. Chevron USA, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board v. Coastal Cargo Co.
Bentonite
Pedigo
FEMA
Riley v. School Board Union Parish
First Bank & Trust v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.
Craven
REUNION, INC. v. Federal Aviation Administration
Adams
Drummond American, LLC v. Share Corp.
Folger Coffee Company v. International Union, et a
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Air Liquide USA LLC
Tradearbed Inc. v. Western Bulk Carriers K/S
TradeArbed Inc v. Medi Trader MV
Franks Investment Co. LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad
Trinity Universal Insurance v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.
ESN, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Illinois Central Railroad v. Harried
Alaniz
Hoog-Watson
Agee v. WAYNE FARMS LLC
Miller v. Blattner
National Labor Relations Board v. Seaport Printing & AD Specialties, Inc.
Maynor v. Dow Chemical Co.
Pedigo v. 3003 SOUTH LAMAR, LLP
Adair
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sfaila, LLC
Adams
Harris v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Altimari
Bivens
McMurray
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
National Union Fire Insurance v. Puget Plastics Corp.
Clarke
Martin
BNSF Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Columbia Sussex Corp.
Radar Solutions, Ltd. v. United States Federal Communications Commission
Frawley
Stone v. Unocal Termination
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co.
Shockey
Stone v. UNOCAL Termination Allowance Plan
National Labor Relations Board v. Grenada Stamping & Assembly Inc.
Coastal International Security Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Gauthier
Rodriguez-Valladares
Ashfaq
Showing 1,051–1,100 of 1,704 rulings · Page 22 of 35
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.