Employment Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit covers the federal courts in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 552 published rulings we track here (1972–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 552 published rulings we track in the Tenth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 537 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 131 summary-judgment rulings here, 99 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 32 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- Union Pacific Railroad Company11
- Sandia National Laboratories6
- City and County of Denver4
- United Parcel Service4
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.4
- King Soopers, Inc.4
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Tenth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
Sandoval
Anderson
Phillips
Thierry
Croy
Board of County Commissioners v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Bailey
Valdez
Lackey Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 226
Daily
Cytrynbaum
Benson
National Labor Relations Board v. CHS Community Health Systems, Inc.
Murphy v. Facet 58, Inc.
Skier's Edge Co. v. Ladapa Die & Tool, Inc.
Amadasu
Horn
Blagg
NewCap Insurance v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.
National Labor Relations Board v. Pueblo of San Juan
National Labor Relations Board v. Interstate Builders, Inc.
Brickey
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W.H. Braum, Inc.
Curry
Croy
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.
Ware
Buck
Campbell
Adams
Parker
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local 5-391 v. Conoco, Inc.
Conatzer
Local 5-857 Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union v. Conoco Inc.
Ellison
Dalton
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dillon Companies
Tinker Air Force Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Carlton
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.
Nance
Inga F. Danville v. Regional Lab Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation Doing Business as Tricore Reference Laboratories
Spaulding v. United Transportation Union
Ellison
Powell
National Labor Relations Board v. King Soopers, Inc.
Silva
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance
Mj Metal Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Mj Metal Products, Inc.
Adkins
Showing 451–500 of 552 rulings · Page 10 of 12
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.