ABM Industries Incorporated
44 federal employment cases from public court records (2008–2025)
6 with a published ruling · 38 open dockets
What public court records show
Public federal court records list ABM Industries Incorporated as an employer in 44 employment matters between 2008 and 2025.
Of the 6 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 had a mixed result, 1 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 ended in a ruling for the employer.
Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 33% of matters with a recorded outcome.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wage Theft, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
About this employer
ABM Industries Incorporated appears in 6 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the broader workplace context. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 6), Wage Theft (2 of 6), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Failure to Accommodate.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: FLSA (29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219) — The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments. See the FLSA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. FLSA.
Rulings span California (3), Wisconsin (1), Arkansas (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Wisconsin rulings and Arkansas rulings.
Case Outcomes
Case Stages
The stage at which courts issued ABM Industries Incorporated’s 6 stage-identified rulings.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with court rulings
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.