Skip to main content
Technology

Computer Sciences Corporation

12 federal employment cases from public court records (20052016)

6 with a published ruling · 6 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Computer Sciences Corporation as an employer in 12 employment matters between 2005 and 2016.

Of the 6 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 ended in a ruling for the worker.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 17% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract.

Cases were filed across 1 state (CA).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

12
Federal Cases
17%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

1
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Computer Sciences Corporation appears in 6 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the technology sector, where age-discrimination, non-compete, and whistleblower-retaliation claims appear frequently. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The case involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.

Rulings span California. California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3 (50%)
Remanded
2 (33%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (17%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued Computer Sciences Corporation’s 6 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
5
Summary judgment
1

Of the 1 summary-judgment rulings, 1 ended the case in Computer Sciences Corporation’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.

What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Claim Types

States

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Computer Sciences Corp.
C.D. Ill. · Dec 2016
Open docket
Employee v. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, INC.
E.D. Pa. · Mar 2016
Open docket
Employee v. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, INC.
E.D. Pa. · Feb 2016
Open docket
Employee v. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP.
W.D. Pa. · Aug 2014
Open docket
Employee v. Computer Sciences Corp
D. Conn. · Jul 2014
Open docket
Employee v. Computer Sciences Corp.
E.D. Va. · Jun 2014
Open docket
Employee v. Computer Sciences Corporation
C.D. Cal. · Jul 2009 · California · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Bailey
9th Circuit · Jan 2009
Defendant Win
Employee v. Bailey
9th Circuit · Jan 2009
Defendant Win
Employee v. United States Secretary of Labor
Ct. Int'l Trade · May 2006
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. United States Secretary of Labor
Ct. Int'l Trade · Jan 2006
Remanded
Employee v. United States Secretary of Labor
Ct. Int'l Trade · Apr 2005
Remanded
Showing 12 of 12

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.