Media General Operations, Inc.
7 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2003–2010)
6 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Media General Operations, Inc. as an employer in 7 distinct federal employment cases between 2003 and 2010.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer and 2 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Failure To Accommodate, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 1 state (VA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Media General Operations, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Media General Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2009) — Defendant Win. Media General Operations, a media company, was involved in a dispute over unfair labor practices under federal labor law. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had made decisions about how the company handled labor relations issues, likely involving employee rights to organize or engage in workplace activities prot… Read the ruling.
Media General Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2007) — Defendant Win. Media General Operations, a media company, was accused of treating unionized employees unfairly in several ways. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) investigated complaints that the company was selectively enforcing its email policy against union supporters, stopped paying employees for time spent in contract neg… Read the ruling.
Media General Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2005) — Defendant Win. An employee at Media General Operations claimed the company unfairly punished them for union-related activities. The employee had been suspended and later fired, and argued this was retaliation for protected whistleblowing and union involvement. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (5 of 6), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 6), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Failure to Accommodate and Breach of Contract.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span Virginia. Virginia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Virginia rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.