Skip to main content
Healthcare

Quest Diagnostics LLC

39 federal employment cases from public court records (20022026)

16 with a published ruling · 23 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Quest Diagnostics LLC as an employer in 39 employment matters between 2002 and 2026.

Of the 11 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 6 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 were sent back to a lower court, 1 were dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 9% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Failure To Accommodate.

Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in CA.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

39
Federal Cases
9%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

4
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Quest Diagnostics LLC appears in 11 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Discrimination (4 of 11), Wrongful Termination (3 of 11), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 11). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Failure to Accommodate.

Rulings span California (3), Florida (2), South Carolina (1), Illinois (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Florida rulings, South Carolina rulings and Illinois rulings.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
6 (55%)
Remanded
2 (18%)
Dismissed
1 (9%)
Mixed Result
1 (9%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (9%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued Quest Diagnostics LLC’s 11 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
5 (45%)
Summary judgment
2 (18%)

Of the 2 summary-judgment rulings, 2 ended the case in Quest Diagnostics LLC’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.

Motion to dismiss
4 (36%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · Feb 2026 · Florida
Defendant Win
Employee v. Quest Diagnostic Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
E.D. Cal. · Nov 2024 · California · Failure to Accommodate
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · May 2024 · California · Sexual Assault
Mixed Result
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
S.D. Ala. · Nov 2023
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Sep 2023 · California · Disability Discrimination
Remanded
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
S.D. Cal. · Aug 2022 · California · Discrimination
Open docket
State ex rel. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Employee
Ohio Ct. App. · Mar 2022
Defendant Win
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
N.D. Ga. · Dec 2021
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · Feb 2021 · Illinois · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
S.D. Cal. · Dec 2020 · California
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Nov 2020 · California · Discrimination
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
D. Alaska · Nov 2020
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · May 2020
Remanded
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
D. Kan. · Jan 2020
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
S.D. Cal. · Oct 2019
Open docket
Employee v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
D.N.J. · Jan 2019
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Ohio Ct. App. · Oct 2018
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · May 2018
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Jan 2018
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
N.D. Ga. · Nov 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
S.D. Ala. · Oct 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
D. Kan. · Jun 2017
Open docket
Employee v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
E.D. Pa. · Jun 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics LLC
D. Conn. · Feb 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Quest Diagnostics LLC
D. Conn. · Jan 2017
Open docket
Showing 25 of 39

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.