Employment Rulings in the Seventh Circuit
The Seventh Circuit covers the federal courts in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,243 published rulings we track here (1975–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,243 published rulings we track in the Seventh Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,238 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 307 summary-judgment rulings here, 203 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 104 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- Union Pacific Railroad Company45
- Abbott Laboratories28
- Board of Education of the City of Chicago12
- Union Pacific Railroad11
- United Airlines, Inc.10
- Chicago Transit Authority9
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Seventh Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Seventh Circuit
Ledesma
Rogers, Eric v. Integrated Process Engineers and Constructors, Inc.
Muhammad
Vasquez
Hickman
Kimberly Barnes-Staples v. Robin Carnahan
Johnson v. Amazon.Com Services, LLC.
Hargett
Hill
Duniya
Kluender, Michelle v. Oak Grove Assisted Care LLC
Cover, Jr. v. OSF Healthcare Systems
Urevig
Gibbs
Campbell
Michael Meadows v. NCR Corporation
Michael Meadows v. NCR Corporation
Beal
Carr
Leffler
Leech
Caputo
Komaniecki
Mitchell v. Cedarhurst of Godfrey Management, LLC
Consolino
Barnes
Mata
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund v. C.N.B. Construction LLC
Butler v. Ford Motor Company
Adzogble
Renfro
Peaster
Mitchell v. Department of Corrections of Wisconsin
Retamozo
John Doe v. Adam Gray
John Doe v. Adam Gray
EEOC v. American Flange and Grief, Inc.
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Regional Transportation Authority
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Drive Construction, Inc.
Sanchez
Luckett
Franks
Mlsna, Mark v. Union Pacific Railroad
Beverly
Bieniek
Teague
Braun
Franks
Regalado
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Event Productions, Inc.
Showing 151–200 of 1,243 rulings · Page 4 of 25
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.