Skip to main content

Employment Rulings in the Seventh Circuit

The Seventh Circuit covers the federal courts in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.

Of the 2,293 published rulings we track here (19732026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.

How These Rulings Ended

Of the 2,293 published rulings we track in the Seventh Circuit.

Defendant Win
994 (43%)
Plaintiff Win
418 (18%)
Mixed Result
401 (17%)
Dismissed
288 (13%)
Remanded
154 (7%)
Settlement
38 (2%)

What Happens at Each Stage

A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 2,252 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.

Appeal
987 (44%)

A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.

Summary judgment
465 (21%)

A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.

Of the 465 summary-judgment rulings here, 273 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 191 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.

Motion to dismiss
632 (28%)

An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Trial verdict
60 (3%)

A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.

Settlement / consent decree
35 (2%)

The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.

Default judgment
34 (2%)

A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.

Other rulings
39 (2%)

Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.

States in This Circuit

Browse rulings from courts in each state the Seventh Circuit covers.

Recent Rulings in the Seventh Circuit

W.

Jun 24, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Melgoza

Jun 14, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Derogatis

Jun 13, 2019S.D. Ill.Remanded

Dietrich

Jun 13, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC

Jun 11, 2019N.D. Ill.Plaintiff Win

Dominick's Finer Foods, LLC v. UFCW Unions & Employers Midwest Pension Fund

Jun 6, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Newton

Jun 4, 2019N.D. Ill.Remanded

Chicago Tribune, LLC v. Teamsters Local Union No. 727

Jun 3, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Rail Terminal Services LLC

May 31, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Jibson

May 29, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

LABR

May 24, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Schewitz

May 21, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Mojapelo

May 17, 2019C.D. Ill.Remanded

Nelson v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

May 16, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Ohr

May 15, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Mlsna

May 15, 2019W.D. Wis.Defendant Win

LABR

May 10, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Kujat

May 2, 2019N.D. Ill.Settlement

Lu Aku v. Chicago Teachers Union

May 1, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Lu Aku v. Chicago Teachers Union

May 1, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Daniel

Apr 29, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Grayson

Apr 25, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Brock Indus. Servs., LLC v. Laborers' Int'l Union of N. Am. Constr.

Apr 8, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Brock Industrial Services, LLC v. Laborers' International Union

Apr 8, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

McMaken

Apr 3, 2019N.D. Ill.Dismissed

Wallace

Mar 28, 2019N.D. Ill.Dismissed

Adama Njie v. Stephanie Dorethy

Mar 28, 20197th CircuitRemanded

Adama Njie v. Stephanie Dorethy

Mar 28, 20197th CircuitRemanded

Adama Njie v. Stephanie Dorethy

Mar 28, 20197th CircuitRemanded

Harbeck

Mar 27, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Tarochione

Mar 26, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Barnes

Mar 25, 2019N.D. Ill.Dismissed

Castaneda

Mar 25, 2019N.D. Ill.Remanded

Walsh

Mar 22, 2019S.D. Ill.Plaintiff Win

Wilkins

Mar 22, 2019N.D. Ill.Settlement

Bigger

Mar 22, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Bakov

Mar 21, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Canada

Mar 21, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Laborers' Pension Fund v. IFE&S Inc.

Mar 20, 2019N.D. Ill.Settlement

Bland

Mar 19, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Rauner

Mar 18, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Fund v. Central Contractors Service, Inc.

Mar 14, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Markette

Mar 11, 2019N.D. Ill.Dismissed

Dietrich

Mar 5, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Dukes

Feb 25, 2019S.D. Ill.Dismissed

Danny Ruark v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan

Feb 20, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Danny Ruark v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan

Feb 20, 20197th CircuitDefendant Win

Dusek

Feb 8, 2019N.D. Ill.Defendant Win

Harris Davis Rebar, LLC v. Structural Iron Workers Local Union No. 1 Pension Trust Fund

Feb 5, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Harris Davis Rebar, LLC v. Structural Iron Workers Local Union No. 1 Pension Trust Fund

Feb 5, 2019N.D. Ill.Mixed Result

Browse Other Circuits

Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.