Hostile Work Environment Cases
1,203 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1972–2026)
177 of 1120 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
About Hostile Work Environment Claims
A hostile work environment claim requires showing that unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic was severe or pervasive enough to create an abusive working environment. Courts consider the frequency, severity, and nature of the conduct, as well as whether it unreasonably interfered with the employee's work performance. Both the subjective experience and an objective standard are evaluated.
Case Outcomes
Related Laws
Top Employers in Hostile Work Environment Cases
Employers most frequently appearing in hostile work environment rulings.
Court Rulings (1,203)
The Plaintiff brought suit against her former employer, alleging sexual harassment by her supervisor and claiming constructive discharge. The Employer moved to compel arbitration based on a provision in the Plaintiff's employment agreement. The Plaintiff responded by invoking the federal Ending…
Dismissal of Moore plaintiffs' First Claim, Count 2, for battery that occurred within the notice period reversed; dismissal of Demma's First Claim, Count 2, for battery reversed; dismissal of Moore plaintiffs' Second Claim for hostile work environment that occurred within the notice period…
Wrongful termination complaint allegations motion to seal motion to strike motion to dismiss motion for protective order final appealable order attorney-client privilege. Judgment affirmed in part reversed in part dismissed in part and remanded. The Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission's…
Showing 301–350 of 1,203 rulings · Page 7 of 25
Browse Other Claim Types
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Think you may have a hostile work environment claim?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.