Skip to main content
Claim Type

Hostile Work Environment Cases

1,203 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1972–2026)

1,203
Total Rulings
16%
Plaintiff Win Rate

177 of 1120 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.

$986,768
Avg Damages Awarded (81 prevailing cases)
N.D. Ill.
Top Court

About Hostile Work Environment Claims

A hostile work environment claim requires showing that unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic was severe or pervasive enough to create an abusive working environment. Courts consider the frequency, severity, and nature of the conduct, as well as whether it unreasonably interfered with the employee's work performance. Both the subjective experience and an objective standard are evaluated.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
500 (42%)
Mixed Result
285 (24%)
Plaintiff Win
177 (15%)
Dismissed
158 (13%)
Remanded
75 (6%)
Settlement
8 (1%)

Top Employers in Hostile Work Environment Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in hostile work environment rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
9 hostile work environment rulings
New York State Department of Labor
8 hostile work environment rulings
Walmart, Inc.
5 hostile work environment rulings
United States Postal Service
5 hostile work environment rulings
Abbott Laboratories
5 hostile work environment rulings

Court Rulings (1,203)

Chavonya Watson v. Heartland Health Laboratories
8th CircuitJun 25, 2015Missouri
Defendant Win
Adam Wiercinski v. Mangia 57, Inc.
2nd CircuitMay 21, 2015New York
Mixed Result$900,000 awarded
Pierce v. Santa Maria Joint Union High School District
9th CircuitMay 18, 2015
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Breed Logistics
6th CircuitApr 22, 2015Tennessee
Plaintiff Win$1,500,000 awarded
Burnett
D.D.C.Apr 22, 2015District of Columbia
Mixed Result
Kennedy N. Mogere, Relator v. Minnesota Masonic Home Northridge (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App.Mar 23, 2015
Defendant Win
Robert S. Paxton, Relator v. Ind. School District 047, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App.Feb 17, 2015
Defendant Win
Billings
DELSUPERCTFeb 13, 2015
Defendant Win
Rubin v. Vista Del Sol Health Services, Inc.
C.D. Cal.Jan 21, 2015California
Plaintiff Win
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PMT Corp.
D. Minn.Aug 27, 2014Minnesota
Mixed Result
Estrada v. San Antonio Independent School District
5th CircuitJul 23, 2014
Defendant Win
Sanguinetti
Cal. Ct. App.Jul 11, 2014
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. A.C. Widenhouse, Inc.
4th CircuitJun 24, 2014
Plaintiff Win
Robert Adams v. Austal, USA, LLC
11th CircuitJun 17, 2014Alabama
Mixed Result
Davis
Cal. Ct. App.Jun 12, 2014
Defendant Win
Nielsen
Or. Ct. App.May 29, 2014Oregon
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Global Horizons, Inc.
E.D. Wash.May 28, 2014Washington
Mixed Result
Tracy Mitchell v. Union Tank Car, L.L.C.
5th CircuitMay 27, 2014Louisiana
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bloomberg L.P.
S.D.N.Y.Apr 28, 2014New York
Defendant Win
Overstreet ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Gunderson Rail Services, LLC
D. Ariz.Apr 8, 2014Arizona
Plaintiff Win
Adams
2nd CircuitMar 21, 2014Connecticut
Defendant Win
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Global Horizons, Inc.
D. Haw.Mar 19, 2014Hawaii
Plaintiff Win
Maxton
E.D.N.Y.Mar 17, 2014New York
Defendant Win
Rogers v. Roosevelt Union Free School District
2nd CircuitFeb 3, 2014New York
Defendant Win
EEOC v Fred Fuller Oil Co., et al.
D.N.H.Jan 31, 2014New Hampshire
Plaintiff Win
Edwards
2nd CircuitJan 31, 2014
Dismissed
Johnson v. Strive East Harlem Employment Group
S.D.N.Y.Jan 2, 2014New York
Plaintiff Win$153,109.59 awarded
Joseph & Marie Alonso, V Qwest Communications Company, Llc
Wash. Ct. App.Dec 31, 2013Washington
Mixed Result
Felt v. MEI Technologies, Inc.
D. Md.Dec 31, 2013Maryland
Defendant Win
Arango v. Telemundo El Paso
W.D. Tex.Dec 30, 2013Texas
Defendant Win
Eartha McMiller v. Metro
8th CircuitDec 26, 2013Missouri
Mixed Result
McNeff v. Emmert
Or. Ct. App.Dec 26, 2013Oregon
Mixed Result$1,758.85 awarded
Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLC
2nd CircuitDec 16, 2013New York
Mixed Result
Donohue v. Finkelstein Memorial Library
S.D.N.Y.Dec 16, 2013New York
Mixed Result
Wise v. Ferriero
D.D.C.Dec 11, 2013District of Columbia
Defendant Win
White v. Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
D.D.C.Nov 26, 2013District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Ashraf-Hassan v. Embassy of France in United States
D.D.C.Nov 19, 2013District of Columbia
Mixed Result
Adams
2nd CircuitOct 23, 2013New York
Defendant Win
HealthBridge
2nd CircuitOct 15, 2013Connecticut
Plaintiff Win
EEOC v. Boh Brothers Const Co., L.L.C.
5th CircuitOct 1, 2013
Plaintiff Win$300,000 awarded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.
5th CircuitSep 27, 2013Louisiana
Mixed Result$300,000 awarded
Cepada
D. Md.Sep 23, 2013Maryland
Defendant Win
Rivera-Melendez v. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLC
1st CircuitSep 20, 2013Puerto Rico
Remanded
Baiden-Adams
E.D. Va.Sep 4, 2013Virginia
Dismissed
Archie Donald v. Buckman Laboratories, Inc.
6th CircuitJun 4, 2013Tennessee
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Finish Line, Inc.
M.D. Tenn.Apr 19, 2013Tennessee
Plaintiff Win$30,000 awarded
Kristin Kepreos v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
6th CircuitApr 3, 2013
Defendant Win
Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada, Inc.
9th CircuitApr 1, 2013
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aurora Health Care Inc.
E.D. Wis.Mar 20, 2013Wisconsin
Defendant Win
Lenzen v. Workers Compensation Reinsurance Ass'n
8th CircuitFeb 11, 2013Minnesota
Defendant Win

Showing 801–850 of 1,203 rulings · Page 17 of 25

Think you may have a hostile work environment claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.