Skip to main content
Finance

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

4 federal employment cases from public court records (20132026)

2 with a published ruling · 2 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Banco Popular de Puerto Rico as an employer in 4 employment matters between 2013 and 2026.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

4
Federal Cases
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico appears in 2 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The case involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.

Claim Types

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
D.P.R. · Apr 2026
Open docket
Employee v. Laboratorio Acrópolis, Inc. Y Otros
PRAPP · Jan 2026
Defendant Win
Employee v. Lozada Ramirez, Emma Marie
PRAPP · May 2024 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
D.P.R. · Nov 2013
Open docket
Showing 4 of 4

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.