Green

On appeal in a case alleging sexual abuse during the minority of a minor plaintiff, the arguments that the Court of Appeals failed to consider the General Assembly's intention to apply the 2021 accrual statute governing such claims retroactively, and the further claims that -- even if the Court of Appeals was correct with regard to the retroactive application of that accrual statute -- it erred in its determination that plaintiff was aware of her injuries and their causal connection to the alleged sexual abuse before she reached the age of majority, are rejected. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding the decision of the Circuit Court sustaining a plea in bar based on the statute of limitations is affirmed.

Appellant did not demonstrate the trial court erred in designating the mother as legal custodian and residential guardian of a minor child without determining a change of circumstances occurred under R.C. 3109.04(E)(1)(a) since, at the request of both parties, the trial court terminated the prior shared parenting decree and plan pursuant to R.C. 3109.04(E)(2)(c). The trial court did not commit reversible error under R.C. 3119.01 in basing its child support calculations on appellant's prior employment where, pursuant to Dach v. Homewood, 10th Dist. No. 14AP-502, 2015-Ohio-4191, the record contained evidence to support a finding appellant was voluntarily underemployed. Judgment affirmed.